
“Salvation and Loneliness”
Sam Peckinpah’s experience with The Deadly Companions had multiple impacts upon him and his subsequent directorial career.
That irksome brother of Maureen O’Hara, Charles Fitzsimons, had refused to allow any changes to the script (not his finest decision in light of the released film and Sam’s later efforts). So Peckinpah resolved to never direct another picture without reserving the right to rewrite.
In reviews of the film, amid the inventory of shortcomings, Peckinpah’s direction did receive some compliments. Always mindful of the next big thing, these plaudits were noticed by the Hollywood community.
And so, in autumn of 1961, MGM sent a script entitled Guns in the Afternoon to Peckinpah’s home. Casting of the lead roles was already complete, but its producer was looking for a director.
Peckinpah enthusiastically accepted the assignment. And immediately commenced rewriting. (The extensive rewrites are covered in the eponymous Reel West book about the film, as noted in this post .)

Those lead roles were filled by Joel McCrea and Randolph Scott. In retrospect, this pairing seemed pre-destined.
The two actors, who were long-time friends, started their careers in silent film, made their name in talkies, and, in the mid-40s, famously chose to perform (almost) exclusively in Westerns. With Audie Murphy, they were 50s mainstays in a specific cinematic niche, the mid-budget oater; in 1959, after completing pictures at about the same time, both effectively retired from the big screen, without announcement or fanfare (McCrea first starring in a television series, Wichita Town, that lasted for one season.)
Said McCrea, “Both Randy and I were washed-up actors playing washed-up lawmen.”
Both men had experience with mercurial, visionary directors, McCrea with Preston Sturges, Scott more recently with Budd Boetticher.
Both were regarded as true gentlemen in a Hollywood that was more rough-and-tumble than contemporaneous studio puffery and later nostalgic recollection indicate.
L.Q. Jones, left, as a vile Hammond brother
According to Ride co-star L.Q. Jones, “Joel was the best human being I ever met and Randy wasn’t far behind him.”*
O’Hara was certainly formidable as the driving force behind The Deadly Companions; Peckinpah had to be on good behavior. Now in full control, how would the volatile young director handle two actors with 60+ years of film experience and 90+ Western roles between them?
Well, as it happened.
Sam on set (and a truck) during the shooting of Ride the High Country
Peckinpah apparently got on with his two stars and, unlike some actors in future films, treated them respectfully. After the film wrapped, McCrea sent the director a hand-written note, forecasting great things for him.
Sam being Sam, though, he did have two moments. Filming began in the Mammoth Lakes area of California and proceeded smoothly. MGM recalled the production company to Los Angeles, however, when the forecast called for an early season snowstorm. Peckinpah refused to ride in the studio’s car and instead rode in the actors’ bus, complaining, playing cards, and drinking entirely too much tequila.
Once production resumed around LA, and while filming the bath sequence, Peckinpah was difficult with his cast and crew, firing at least one person. This behavior persisted for several days, after which he settled into the business of making the movie.
Foreshadowing future problems, he ultimately did not have the final cut of the film, although the sympathetic producer involved him in the process by phone.
Sam and CinemaScope
The movie’s post-production history is well-known. MGM had few hopes for the film and attempted to bury it on the bottom of a double bill. Critics, however, both in the US and Europe, appreciated its artistry, recognizing the actors and director, with Newsweek naming it the best movie of 1962.
Sam Peckinpah had arrived as a big-screen director.
Jeff’s Take:
One of the best aspects… is undoubtedly the interplay of McCrea and Scott… Joel McCrea and Randolph Scott were never better.

Each film you see [RG Armstrong]…you think that one is his best performance.
Top-notch acting.
If the film is about integrity and moral courage, it is also essentially about solitude. It is, in fact, a masterpiece.
RR’s Take:
A very important and very fine film.
I’ve seen Ride two or three times over the years but always several years apart. It was really interesting to watch it again, in chronological sequence with the rest of Peckinpah’s Westerns. I understand why Bud and so many of our readers revere this movie. A farewell to Scott and McCrea, two of the finest Western stars, and to the classical Western itself (and even to the wider classic Hollywood in which our noble genre had thrived). As encapsulated by that magnificent final shot but also in so many smaller moments (an example, one of my favourites, is when McCrea seeks privacy to don his spectacles to read the contract: this small bit of business throws so much light on the character, his dignified and quiet pride as he ages).
“I must say, Mr. Judd, I expected a much younger man.”
“Well, I used to be. We all used to be.”
I admire the cinematography, too, especially of the exteriors: a little like in the Anthony Mann films, the landscape is almost one of the characters in the film, alongside the human protagonists. (I should note that my copy is the DVD release of around 20 years ago, which looks good but I should imagine the more recent BluRay really adds to the experience.) This all said, I’m slightly puzzled at myself as to why Ride the High Country doesn’t completely do it for me, hovering just below my top echelon of favourite oaters. I find it drags in a few places, and don’t enjoy some of the minor characters. But no question: this is a majestic Western and one of the most significant ever made.
Sam-wise, the theme of past-their-prime characters seeking a final redemption is, to my mind, at its most powerful here partly for the exact reason that we’re still, just about, in the old Hollywood that the film draws to a close, so it’s done without the violent excess of later movies.

An interesting historical footnote: on its original UK cinema release the original script title Guns in the Afternoon was used, rather than Ride the High Country. I think I slightly prefer that original title, actually – it’s less generically Western and somehow seems to evoke the mood and theme of the film: these men have reached the afternoon of their lives.
Bud’s Take:
On occasion, hearing a certain song transports me, if only for a moment, to a certain time or place in my life. Music can spark that kind of emotional reaction. For me, Ride the High Country triggers a similar connection. The reason goes beyond the film’s story or dialogue or photography or actors (although admittedly McCrea and Scott are my two favorite performers in our noble genre).
I first viewed Ride while filling unwanted free time after several thousand colleagues and I were suddenly relieved of our job responsibilities. Sitting on my couch, with concerns about my working future hovering closely, I was electrified and oddly encouraged by the character of Steve Judd, his satisfaction in finding employment that he considered meaningful after years of working in brothels and saloons.
(I hasten to note this experience is well in the past, I have gratefully rejoined the ranks of the working, and the afore-mentioned is merely an anecdote to be shared.)
But at that time of my life, over Ride’s 94 minutes, I found – and still find – resonance in the film’s themes in general, and Steve Judd’s story arc in particular.
Certainly, my feelings for the film are specific and unique to my particular circumstance. I understand and accept that the movie doesn’t strike an emotional chord for everyone… just look at the IMDB user reviews!
But the picture does have other strengths to which I direct attention:

Randolph Scott, reveling in the chance to play a crooked arrow, relishing the ripostes given to him, and at movie’s end, filling that ‘expressively inexpressive’ face, so stony in so many movies, with a rockslide of silent feeling as his fallen partner provides his final testimony.

McCrea’s burning stare and clipped delivery in the betrayal scene, embodying his disappointment in and fury at his partner; for an actor sometimes described as ‘understated’, ‘amiable’, and even ‘stolid’ (!), McCrea played anger very well.
And finally, the film’s shattering final scene which, as described above by RR, signified more than the end of a movie; a scene which hushed the set, inspired Sam Peckinpah to quietly walk over to the prone McCrea and whisper, “That’s it. You got it,” ** and brought Randolph Scott to tears…
It moves me beyond my capacity for words.

Bibliography and References:
Nott, Robert: Reel West, Ride the High Country; University of New Mexico Press, 2024
Suton, Koraljka: Cinephilia & Beyond
This article currently contains a link to the film’s shooting script and schedule
*Thomas, Nick: Interview with L.Q. Jones; multiple sources, 2017
**Weddle, David: “If They Move… Kill ‘Em!”; Grove Press, 1994
21 Responses
SUPER review of one FINE movie ! ! ! !
Bud makes clear that it’s his favorite film, while Jeff has it on his Top 17. Chris Evans ranks it among his favorites, as do Nicholas Anez and Kevin.
Like RR, I don’t quite rank it among my favorites–but “Ride the High Country” (1962) richly deserves 5 stars ! ! ! I remember liking it when I first saw it in 2018 (I gave it 4 stars), but I didn’t remember much about it.
Now, after seeing it 3 times (twice in the last couple of weeks), I can see why I liked it. I want to comment more extensively, but I can’t right now.
I will say this: 5 stars, and now I’m going to remember it more vividly. “Ride the High Country” signals the arrival of ONE SPECIAL DIRECTOR ! ! !
Excellent review. I’ve loved it since I first saw it. That ending! McCrea and Scott. The bad seed brothers. The Wedding. Mariette Hartley. So much perfection by Ballard, by Peckinpah, by everybody.
The wedding freaked me out when I first saw the movie last year. I’ve sat through a love of celluloid Frontier scariness the last five years, but somehow Peckinpah’s direction made me uneasy like nothing before…precisely what he wanted, I might add.
Edgar Buchanan’s wedding speech is fantastic, so memorable.
The lighting and camera work. Peckinpah’s writing. And most of all, Buchanan’s performance. Just a jewel of a scene… and the calm before the storm.
RTHC already contains most of the elements typically associated with Sam Peckinpah, especially the passing of the West, (betrayed) friendship, loyalty, looking back over deeds of the past etc., all themes he will keep on working in 2 of his masterpieces The Wild Bunch and Patt Garrett and Billy the Kid, also in Cable Hogue.
These themes were not exclusive to him when we think of The Man Who Would shot Liberty Valance for instance (released the very same year) or William Wellman’s Buffalo Bill starring… Joel McCrea, or even Robert Altman’s one with Paul Newman. Lonely Are the Brave in the same vein, The Misfits or Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid showing 2 phased out younger buddies.
Beside of all its inherent qualities already discussed extensively, what makes this film so special and moving is the nostagic presence of 2 of the more iconic actors of the genre in their last hurrah and probably in 2 of their best parts ever. Very similar to John Wayne in The Shootist (an other end of the West western) with his old pal James Stewart. Above all, RTHC is an intense reflexion on life and mostly death.
In my top five. Whenever I need a movie to provide some moral guidance, on it goes
Peckinpah is one of those directors with a talent for creating both the beautiful and the ugly. Right now I’m thinking about the ugly. Yes, those Hammond boys are vile. Absolutely. However….
As a follower of Christ–I came to Christ at age 25–I have to say Joshua Knudsen (R.G. Armstrong) is genuinely terrifying. He spouts words from the Bible, but he has no understanding of how to live it.
Peckinpah also casts Armstrong as Bible-thumping Bob Ollinger in “Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid” (1973, my #24 movie of all time, all genres). Ollinger tells Billy the Kid (Kris Kristofferson) to repent and turn to the Lord–and in the same sentence calls the Kid all kinds of cuss words.
Ollinger makes Christianity look bad, but the scene plays like a comedy. Billy the Kid laughs at Ollinger, and Deputy Bell finally tells Ollinger to shut up.
Bob Ollinger looks ridiculous–but Joshua Knudsen makes me ill.
He loved using RG Armstrong in those types of roles. His interview about Peckinpah on YouTube is priceless.
Jeff had written an excellent text about Robert Golden (!) Armstrong here:
https://jeffarnoldswest.com/2022/09/the-westerns-of-rg-armstrong/
EXCELLENT write-up ! ! ! ! MAN ! ! ! All readers of Jeff Arnold’s West should read this article.
Thanks for calling it to my attention.
Having fun so far! I can’t wait for the Major Dundee write-up. Truly an underrated epic; it’s my favorite of the Civil-War-in-Mexico subgenre.
Yes, it has been fun ! ! ! “Ride the High Country” (1962, 5 stars) deserves more recognition in the greater cinematic community–but it’s highly respected by serious Western fans.
I’ve ordered “Major Dundee” (1965) from Amazon. It’s the extended addition, with 13 minutes of restored footage. I know very little about “Major Dundee,” but Chris Evans uses the words “what might have been.”
Looking forward to seeing it. RR, Jean-Marie, and Chris Evans have it on their Favorite Westerns lists, and Pete Hale is enthusiastic about it ! ! !
As an appetizer or a nightcap depending if you have already watched it, I recommand Jeff’s brilliant narration of this epic film in every way.
https://jeffarnoldswest.com/2022/01/major-dundee-columbia-1965/
Haven’t yet seen it. So Jeff’s article, when I can get to it, will be a fun appetizer.
“Epic film.” MAN. You LOVE this movie. Like I said, I know very little about it. The DVD arrived yesterday–I’ll have to watch it soon.
Thanks.
Excited to see appetites whetted for Peckinpah 3, which will, in fact, cover Major Dundee! Keep those comments primed and ready for when it drops.
I watched Major Dundee many years ago and haven’t revisited it yet in my long quest to watch (or rewatch) as many significant Westerns as I can – I recall finding it a bit tedious, both underbaked and somehow overblown at the same time. But it is an important part of Peckinpah’s work so a rewatch is due before y’all discuss it.
And a big thanks for reminding me I needed a copy of RTHC! A DVD is inbound to our mailbox and I’m really looking forward to watching it again – one of the best Westerns ever.
JS, I agree 100% with your assessment of Major Dundee. Underbaked and overblown indeed, a real disappointment. I watched a DVD touting restored footage, which I suppose helped somewhat … but not enough in my opinion.
One of the good things that came of it is Sam regrouped, reorganized and with ‘The Wild Bunch’ hit his target exactly. Without the ‘Dundee’ experience which I find flawed but endlessly fascinating the thing might not have been accomplished.
Ron Starr does a fine job as Heck Longmire. It’s great to see how he matures over the course of the movie–with Steve Judd and Gil Westrum keeping him in line–and how he grows to treat Elsa with the highest love and respect.
As I’ve said, “Ride the High Country” (1962) richly deserves 5 stars ! ! !
Regarding “Major Dundee” (1965, 5 stars), now that I’ve seen it for the first time….
Yes, 5 stars. I’ll withhold extended commentary until Bud and RR post their review.
Right now I have got to say we have ourselves a great American storyteller. Mr. Peckinpah finds new ways to stun me.