Jeff Arnold’s West

The blog of a Western fan, for other Western fans

The TV Western, Part 3/3: the decline (but not fall)

.

 

.

This is the last episode of a three-part post on the TV Western. To read part 1, about the early days of TV oaters, click here. The second part, about the heyday of the genre, is here.

 



The Western rides off into the sunset

 

The Sixties, we all know, were a time of conflict for America. Assassinations, civil rights injustices, racial tension, Vietnam, feminism, they all seemed to many (poor misguided) people to make the Western less relevant. There was also growing pressure on the TV companies from various bluestocking groups such as PTAs, churches, even the US Senate, to tone down the violence which, said a Senate subcommittee, “can and does contribute to the development of attitudes and actions in many young people which pave the way for delinquent behavior”, although no evidence whatever was presented to justify the assertion that youths were watching Gunsmoke and then going out to loot stores. Given the bourgeois morality purveyed by Western shows, if anything they would have had the reverse effect. But of course they had no effect at all. Anyway, it was the juvenile delinquents’ moms and dads who were watching the Westerns.

 

Then there was the argument, put forward by JFK’s head of the FCC Newton N Minow, “What will the people of other countries think of us [when they see Westerns]?” Well, actually, Mr Minow, if you want to know, the people of other countries loved Westerns just as much as Americans did.

 

Westerns clean up their act

 

At any rate, Westerns began to change. They were cleaned up and viewers saw less shooting or fisticuffs and there were fewer scenes of saloons and their denizens. And they became more ‘domestic’. The shows that did well were family sagas of one kind another, the Cannon family on The High Chaparral, the Cartwrights on the Ponderosa and Victoria Barkley in The Big Valley. If there wasn’t an actual blood family, Westerns adapted so that there was a family unit. Gunsmoke’s Matt, Doc, Kitty, Festus and, latterly, Newly the gunsmith became one happy family, looking out for each other. Series began to emphasize human concern, tolerance and charity. More children and young adults appeared.
.
.
All this heart-warming domesticity worked, up to a point. Gunsmoke’s ratings had been in slow but inexorable decline all through the 60s. The average audience, 17 million in 1960 – 61, was, by 1966 – 67, down to 10 million and the series was near cancelation. Once the new ‘cleaned up’ family plots kicked in, from the 1967 – 68 season, it went back up to 14 million, and many of these were new and younger viewers.
Some shows maybe got a bit gimmicky, to attract different audiences. CBS’s The Wild Wild West in the late 60s, created by Michael Garrison and starring Robert Conrad and Ross Martin, was a Western/James Bond crossover.

 

Fewer series

 

Significantly, though, more and more shows were canceled and new ones were fewer and fewer. The ones that did launch lasted a season or two at most. In the fall of 1969 no new Western series at all was aired. Under the headline ‘TV Westerns Bite the Dust’, an article in a 1969 edition of Variety said:

 

A little gunplay, a fist in the gut, an occasional trampling in a stampede, a saloon brawl, a ranch on fire … these have been the lifeblood of the classic American morality tale, and now they’re no longer considered civilized.

 

Of course violence didn’t disappear from TV screens. Far from it. It just migrated to cop shows. In 1984 the National Coalition on TV Violence (hardly, I agree, the most impartial of commentators) estimated that screen violence had risen 75% since 1980. But Westerns got the blame and TV executives were too sensible, or sensitive, or pusillanimous not to react.

 

It is interesting to note the prevalence of the language and symbolism of the Western in Vietnam. The generation of Americans fighting there had grown up with Westerns, mostly on TV, and it was no accident that leading celluloid cowboy John Wayne was so high profile there. Troops called dangerous areas “Indian country”, they scrawled on their flak jackets THE ONLY GOOD GOOK IS A DEAD ONE and Vietnamese scouts were called Kit Carsons. It wasn’t new. David Shea Teeple in The American Mercury in 1958 wrote, “Would a Wyatt Earp stop at the 38th Parallel, Korea, when the rustlers were escaping with his herd?” Those who saw the Cold War, and its hotter moments, as simply a struggle between good (the Americans, obviously) and evil (the Commies, obviously) had seen Westerns as an illustrative fable. Time magazine in 1959 argued that the Western was “the great American morality play”, in which “good and evil, … Christian and Pagan fight to the finish on the vast stage of the unbroken plain.” The article added, “In its finest expression [the Western] is an allegory of freedom, a memory and a vision of the deepest meaning of America.”

 

The Western wasn’t their story

 

But as the 1960s dribbled to a close, people who saw it in those terms were fewer and fewer. A 1967 show like Custer, with its emphasis on military glory, was hardly in tune with the feeling of the day. Increasingly voices were raised to say that huge numbers of people actually lost their freedom as the West was ‘won’. ‘Manifest Destiny’ entailed the conquest and subjugation of those who had lived for centuries in the ‘empty wilderness’. Native Americans, racial and religious minorities, industrial laborers and women didn’t see the Western as ‘their’ story any more. Westerns, in which the protagonists were overwhelmingly male, white and Protestant, were increasingly seen as anachronisms. Interest waned. And once ratings fall off, TV execs – and their sponsors – are pretty damn quick to axe a show.
.
.
 
.
Westerns were launched in the 1970s and a few became reasonably popular. Kung Fu was ranked 82 and Alias Smith & Jones got up to 55 but these figures were a far cry from the huge number of viewers for Westerns in the 50s and early 60s. You’d think the Reagan era would be good for Westerns, but no. By the time we got to the 1980s the genre had all but disappeared, and the few shows that were launched (Bret Maverick, Gun Shy, The Yellow Rose and the like) had very low ratings and didn’t last. It was all over.

 

Or so we thought.

 

Death of the cowboy

 

The 1980s were also the time when big-screen Westerns were pronounced dead. Michael Cimino had almost sunk the genre single-handed with his Titanic-like Heaven’s Gate and studios shyed like unbroken broncs at the idea of splashing out budget on oaters. It wasn’t until mid-decade, 1985, that two film-makers, praise be to them, managed to bring out good and big A-Westerns, Clint Eastwood’s Pale Rider and Lawrence Kasdan’s Silverado, and people began to think there might be a future for the genre after all. And where Hollywood leads, TV will often follow…
.
.
 
.
In May 1979 NBC had aired The Sacketts, a two-part adaptation of a series of Louis L’Amour novels, and the Western mini-series was born. The made-for-TV Western movie had already begun to see the light of day. In 1980 CBS’s series The Gambler, with Kenny Rogers, began. And of course at the end of the 80s the perfectly splendid Lonesome Dove showed the way. Suddenly it was TV that had the budget and the time to show adaptations of long novels. Lonesome Dove was followed by several prequels and sequels and they were watched by millions, again.
.
.
 

 

.

Hallmark and other channels produced made-for-TV Western movies, and still are doing so. These films can tend towards the bland and they aren’t always very good. They are, I suppose, the 21st century’s B-movies. But Westerns are being made, and, presumably, watched (sponsors wouldn’t tolerate them otherwise).

 

In the 1990s big-screen Westerns like Open Range (in some ways the centenary Western), Tombstone, Wyatt Earp, Unforgiven and Dances with Wolves drew big crowds and some even won Oscars, and the TV execs began to think there was life in the old dog yet. The new Westerns began to show Indians, women, African-Americans, Chinese in a more positive light. And that trend has continued into our own century. Westerns do not come out every week but they don’t do badly.

 

And new outlets for TV programs, the likes of HBO and Netflix, are producing movies and series. Deadwood was the most shining example, a stunningly good Western in every way.
 .
.

 

.

According to IMDb, there have been 347 Western TV series, mini-series, TV movies and specials in the current century to date (November 2023). That’s not bad, I guess.

 

We might pick out from those 350-odd the TV remakes of famous big-screen Westerns like The Virginian, High Noon, Angel and the Bad Man and The Legend of Butch and Sundance, those nice Tom Selleck films like Crossfire Trail and Monte Walsh, Shakespearean adaptations such as King of Texas (King Lear), HBO’s And Starring Pancho Villa as Himself and Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, Deadwood of course, those Karl-May- Spiele such as Winnetou und das Geheimnis der Felsenburg and so on, the excellent Broken Trail, the continuing Lonesome Dove sequel Comanche Moon, the very good Justified, if you call that a Western, Hell on Wheels, Hatfields & McCoys, the contemporary Western Longmire, The Pinkertons, The Ranch (more of a soap), Wynonna Earp (vampires and such), Frontier, which I liked, the TV version of the fine novel The Son, Godless (rather good), Taylor Sheridan’s Westerns and semi-Westerns such as 1883, 1923, Yellowstone and the brand new Lawmen: Bass Reeves, the recent Billy the Kid, and The English.

 

You may have other favorites I haven’t mentioned. You’ll find reviews of many of the above list in the index.

 

But I think the list is long enough to assert that the TV Western ain’t dead yet.

 

We watch TV Westerns now as downloads, on demand, on the new big screens many of us have or even on the iPad or phone. The Western has always adapted, from the dime novel, to the Wild West show, to the early flickers, to the serials, to TV. And I see no reason why it should not continue to do so. We all want fantasies, about the past, the future. It isn’t called escapism for nothing. To argue, as J Fred MacDonald does, that the Western has become incompatible with modern, urban, technological society is to miss the point. The lives we lead today are precisely why we like stories of simpler, more rural, wilder times.

 

Assuredly, the ‘inevitable’ death of the Western has been yet again postponed.

.

10 Responses

  1. Bravo on this entire series of posts. Believe it or not — I hated westerns as a boy, and never looked at any of them. It was only in my adulthood that I came to my senses. At any rate … we do lots of vintage westerns now because the running time is so manageable. We are especially partisan to Bat Masterson, Rawhide, Have Gun Will Travel, Wanted: Dead or Alive, and, of course, The Lone Ranger….

    We kinda liked Stories of the Century, too. Next up, we will work our way through The Rifleman.

    1. My deepest condolences for having hated Westerns as a boy but so glad you saw the light. Excellent selection of ones that you have watched (though I was never the greatest Rawhide fan: my sisters liked it). You will enjoy The Rifleman, I think. Often quite intelligent writing.
      Jeff

  2. Enjoying your Blogs the western is my favorite genre.Some of the Gunsmokes from the early 60s like The Gallows, Owney Tupper Had A Daughter & Kate Heller were brillant.Enjoyed the Virginian but my favorite was Cimarron Strip don't understand why people didn't like it.Thought Stuart Whitman was great.Agree with you the cast could have been better.Even as a kid never liked Bonanza.And now though I loved it as a kid find The High Chaparral samey every episode.Reading your blogs I now want to see Hombre and maybe Deadwood.Finally Paul Green who wrote a good book on the Virginian thinks Stuart Whitman was miscast in Cimarron Srip!Come on!

  3. PS forgot I loved The Outcasts as a kid did you ever see it.It was another one season show ,never seen on DVD.Enjoyed Lancer too don't know if I would now.But liked James Stacy.Always thought Joe Kidd was better than High Plains Drifter but not many other people think so.Must give Pale Rider another look.

    1. Great comments, Steve. Thanks very much. Agree about the quality of Cimarron Strip. Hombre and Deadwood both outstanding – you won't be disappointed. I never saw The Outcasts. Must try it if I can find it. Joe Kidd is indeed vastly better than HPD. Pale Rider could be even better than its progeniro, Shane. (Seriously). Best wishes, Jeff.

  4. I know that it is not one of your favorite as told in the more recent feature film text, but I did not see any mention of the still very popular The Wild Wild West… Or maybe I missed it. It was an interesting cross over like James Bond goes West, possibly bringing a new public to the western world. That makes me think of Westworld or Hell on Wheels which are not there either. Surely a hard task to keep on refreshing and updating this kind of general articles with new additions coming on a regular basis…

    1. I reviewed Warners’ WILD WILD WEST back in 2017 but haven’t done the TV one. I never watched it thoroughly all through. I looked at MGM’s feature WESTWORLD in 2013 and HBO’s TV WESTWORLD (which I didn’t really like) in 2020. I’ve reviewed AMC’s HELL ON WHEELS seasons 1 – 3. You’ll find them all in the index.

  5. Thanks I have checked these ones and knew youcdid not like TV WW (like me…). My point was that you need to add them WITHIN your general text about the TV Shows to make it as complete as possible with the links accordingly

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *