I feel that discussing a thousand oaters is a kind of achievement. It seems a lot in some ways. But it’s a small proportion of the total (luckily, as this means I have still many to write about).
How many Westerns are there?
In his introduction to The Rough Guide to Westerns (2006), Paul Simpson says, “With over 8000 Westerns to choose from, selecting 50 that are essential to the genre is an arduous task.” IMDb.com lists 8,113 Westerns if you sort its movies by genre. So, about 8000 then?
No. IMDb’s list is certainly very incomplete – even The Great Train Robbery (1903), which most people regard as the first ‘proper’ Western, is absent (though IMDb does have it separately) and the list mentions only eleven Westerns before 1914 – obviously absurd. Wikipedia lists 55 Westerns made between 1903 and 1914 and there may well have been more. Many early silent Westerns have been lost. Surviving ones, including shorts and fragments, are certainly very numerous.
And then it depends on how you define a Western. Purists will say that a Western must be set west of the Mississippi, in the United States and territories (i.e. not Canada or Mexico) between the end of the Civil War and the end of the nineteenth century, but others (including this blog) define the genre much more widely. Westerns can be set in the eighteenth or twentieth centuries and even be set in Australia. There are sub-genres and crossovers: horror Westerns, sci-fi Westerns, spaghetti westerns, and so on. So saying how many there are is pretty well impossible.
If you go into Advanced Search on IMDb and put in the parameters Westerns from January 1903 to April 2018 you get 14,779 titles listed. So that’s a bit more realistic.
The genre – I am talking about the Western as narrative fiction – is about 115 years old. The Great Train Robbery was such a smash hit that it was followed by a host of imitations. By 1908 the genre was so well established that distributors’ catalogues listed releases under Drama, Comic and Western. For years the genre dominated production. Through the inter-war period and beyond the Western waxed and waned but never went away. Happily.
So keep on clicking, e-pards, and while we’ll never get to the very end of the list, we’ll try to do a good few more.
Today’s Western really ought to be a truly great landmark one like, say, High Noon, The Searchers or My Pal Trigger. But we’ve done those. So here are some comments on Keith Larsen and Jim Davis in a late 50s low-budgeter.
Apache Warrior (Fox, 1957)
This is a true story. Not.
In reality, Sieber seems to have had an attitude to Kid that is hard to pin down. He mentored the young man and the Kid was Al’s protégé, and most accounts say he did not bear a grudge against the Kid for the bullet to the foot he received when Kid came in to surrender (it was in any case almost certainly not the Kid who fired it). Yet, the Kid seems to have made some anti-Sieber remarks later on and Al testified against the Kid at the second (civil) trial, playing a not insignificant part in the Kid’s conviction. At any rate, one thing is certain: Sieber (and still less Ziegler) did not track down, arrest or kill the Kid.
Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl was involved in a riot while drunk, and to prevent his being hanged by Mexican authorities, Sieber sent him back north. In May 1887, Sieber and several army officers left the San Carlos post on business, and Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl was put in charge of the scouts in their absence. The scouts went on a tiswin drunk and this resulted in a fight between a scout named Gon-Zizzie and Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl’s father, Togo-de-Chuz, and the father was killed. In turn, friends of Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl then killed Gon-Zizzie, and Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl killed Gon-Zizzie’s brother, Rip.
On June 1 Sieber confronted the scouts. Several shots were fired from the crowd and a bullet hit Sieber in the ankle. This almost crippled him. He was laid up for a long time, then walked on crutches. During the confusion following the shots, Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl and several others fled.
Of course as soon as we read the introductory announcement after the titles of Apache Warrior THIS IS A TRUE STORY, we know we are in for hogwash of historical hokum. And so it proves. In this telling Haskay-bay-nay-ntayl is known as the Apache Kid to the whites and is called Katawan by the Apaches. Probably Katawan was less of a mouthful than Haskay bay-nay-ntayl. He is pretty well a goody throughout, so very different from the Stories of the Century one. He only gets into trouble by killing his brother’s murderer in accordance with Apache customs and at the behest of the one-armed chief Nantan (John Miljan). There is no mention of tiswin drunks or other misdemeanors/causes. And it’s his brother, Chikisin (Dehl Berti), not his dad, who is killed.
Nantan just means chief or leader in Apache, or possibly spokesman. The people awarded the title to General Crook, calling him Nantan Lupan, or chief wolf. Miljan, the IMDb bio tells us, “played handsome, debonair romantics in silent films but turned into an archetypal villain after realizing his aristocratic good looks had a certain cold, shady quality that could be longer-lasting in bad guy roles.” I remember him as Custer in Paramount’s The Plainsman in 1936. He had starred with Harry Carey in Silent Sanderson in 1925 (a useful title for a silent movie) and had co-starred with Rin Tin Tin in another silent in 1928. He was Ringo in the James Cagney Western The Oklahoma Kid but he never led in a Western as far as I know. In Apache Warrior he plays an elderly chief who has made an accommodation with the whites but regrets it.
So much for it being a true story.
As I’ve said before, I have no problem at all with Western movies being unhistorical. That’s not what they are for. It’s only when they claim to tell the true story that I object. Perhaps the producers want to make it more realistic or sensational but another word for such a claim would be a lie.
The director was Elmo Williams, a former editor, especially at RKO, who earned an Oscar for editing High Noon. He started directing for Lippert and Republic, and was later Managing Director of European Production for Fox. He only helmed two Westerns, though: this one and The Tall Texan with Lloyd Bridges in 1953.
Keith Larsen, topping the billing (even above Jim) is the Apache Kid. Larsen, a “strapping, dark-haired, ruggedly handsome actor who appeared in mostly secondary roles in a number of 1950s film actioneers” (IMDb) was most famous as Brave Eagle on TV in 1955 and ’56, so was quite used to being an Indian. The year after Apache Warrior he would be Major Robert Rogers in the TV version of Northwest Passage. He plays the Kid as the strong, silent type, finding it beneath him to justify himself before the military authorities and just clenching his teeth at the seven years in Yuma he is awarded.
The Kid has an amour, naturally. It’s Nantan’s daughter Liwana , played by Eugenia Paul in her first movie. Later that year she would become Zorro’s beloved on TV. She remained typecast in Hispanic or Native American maiden parts in TV Westerns.
The Kid despises Martine (who carves a corporal’s stripes on his bare arm) but feels obliged to escape with him. He is an unwilling raider, though. Still, the Army major attributes all Martine’s crimes to the Kid and finally, in desperation, puts a price on the Kid’s head knowing that loathsome bounty hunters (Ray Kellogg, Karl Davis and Allan Nixon) will crawl out of the woodwork and hunt the Kid down. They actually do, coming up to the Kid and Liwana by following Ziegler, and blasting away with their Winchesters. Of course once Ziegler has seen the error of his ways and joined up with the Kid and Liwana, the bounty hunters don’t stand a chance. They are killed and the trio ride off. The End.
A postscript tells us that the Apache Kid was never seen again.
There you go. As long as you don’t believe a word of it you’ll probably be entertained for 74 minutes. It is quite pro-Indian, so that’s one good thing.
Cheers to your milestone Jeff,very impressive….
here's to the next 1000.
All I remember about APACHE WARRIOR is that it was a lot
less studio bound than most RegalScope fare.
I recall it had lots of rugged location work.
Jeff these RegalScope flicks that you are tracking down
would any be widescreen versions?
I might add a very fine review (and history lesson)
surely better than the film deserves.
Yes, there is more (Californian) location shooting than usual.
Regalscope was a widescreen process, which is we we usually see it in a reduced rectangular form today.
First off, Jeff, many congrats on reaching your 1000th western review! I only discovered your great blogsite in the past year or so but I dive in most days and derive much knowledge and pleasure from it.
"APACHE WARRIOR" is one film I have been unable to track down, certainly in decent form, which is a shame as Jim Davis is something of a favourite with me.
Excellent review and very well-researched as always.
Yes, I too am a bit of a Jim Davis fan (excluding Dallas and Stories of the Century). Some of those Republic Westerns of the 50s weren't half bad.
Congratulations Jeff. You were bemoaning that the movie was maybe not as 'significant' as number 1000 could be. Are there any movies that would benefit from a revisit? I read the 2 'Forty Guns' reviews with interest. Are there any movies you think you may have got wrong? Paul
Yes, Paul, I do think so. Sometimes on re-viewing a Western, opinions change. I also think that back in the early days (2010) some of the reviews were a bit skimpy and didn't do the movies justice. So I will be re-visiting some!
Of course, what this site really needs is prizes. And I think I may have come up with one. I was watching a movie the other day and it was so lacking in dramatic interest that I actually thought to myself this actually makes 'The Way West' seem gripping. So I would like to announce the Movie-So-Lacking-In-Dramatic-Interest-It-Actually-Makes-The Way West-Look-Like-High Noon award. Nomination: James Stewart 'Strategic Air Command'. Two hours of my life with nothing more interesting to think of than how awful June Alyson's dresses were. Paul
An enticing category and I can already think of a few candidates. Not Strategic Air Command, though, as (a) it's not a Western and (b) I can't remember it.
(b) USAF reservist James Stewart is called back into SAC. He does his grumpy routine about it. His wife June Alyson acts quite silly and has skirts that cover a whole sofa. Um – that's it. Paul
I watched SAC after a gap of many years just last week. Personally, I enjoyed it. James Stewart is an actor I pretty well always enjoy admittedly but really it was very much of its time, including voluminous skirts and attitudes. Part of the attraction for me, I suppose.
I see what you mean, Paul.
Jeff, congratulations on have written 1,000 reviews. My hat is off to your stick-to-it determination. I am in awe of your abilities. Keep up the really good work, because I so enjoy your triggering my memories.
I really enjoyed this review, because of my interest in the Apache Kid. I first read about him in a book titled WESTERN SHERIFFS AND MARSHALS(1955) written by Thomas Penfield and illustrated with black and white drawings by Robert Glaubke. I've read several books and articles about the Apache Kid over the last thirty-eight years. Along with Jeff, I think the Kid was still living well past 1894, probably well into the 1900's.
APACHE WARRIOR can be found on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4ix10msRdY&t=173s Also, for real hokum check out THE APACHE KID ESCAPES(1930) with Jack Perrin as the Kid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbM4VphGp7Q
That Jack Perrin one sounds a must. iI'll give it a go!
Completing 1000 reviews is a great task and completing it with Apache Warrior is a great thing too. This was my Dad's fav movie as he liked Western Movies.
My dad was a great Tom Mix fan. We kind of inherit a love for movies…